Despite what appears to be a strong correlation between student achievement, future ready skills, and the use of technology, the majority of the studies found tend to point to these gains in the middle school and high school levels only (Kulik, 2003). Because drill and practice activities and taking comprehension quizzes on the computer are not fundamentally different from simply taking a paper/pencil test, taking an oral exam, or preparing a book report, there is not much of a change instructionally. These are often the methods that are being used in the elementary classrooms, rather than more interactive, research-type activities. Similar activities have been taking place in classrooms for ages, just not with the aid of technology. I would guess that this lack of “change in delivery” of instruction is one more reason that elementary implementation of technology has not shown the results seen at older age levels. <<<Click here to read more>>>
Written by Keith Madill
Written by Keith Madill
No comments:
Post a Comment